|
|
|
Will I Know How Many Visitors Come To My Website?
Legal PR |
2021/08/14 05:03
|
Yes, we install Google Analytics upon the client’s request. Google Analytics is the most widely used website statistics service – currently in use on around 55% of the 10,000 most popular websites.
Google Analytics is implemented with “page tags”, in this case, called the Google Analytics Tracking Code, which is a snippet of JavaScript code that the website owner adds to every page of the website.
The tracking code runs in the client browser when the client browses the page and collects visitor data and sends it to a Google data collection server as part of a request for a web beacon.
Read more |
|
|
|
|
|
Law Firm Website Redesign
Legal PR |
2021/08/02 17:38
|
Is your law firm web site generating enough case leads? If not, can you easily analyze your traffic to find out why? Are potential customers even finding you? Perhaps your current site is difficult to navigate and the relevant information is not clearly apparent to visitors. Is your content out of date because updating your site is difficult?
Your Brand, Your Message. You’re in Control
Law Promo’s web redesign is completely customized and tailored to each of our clients. It bears repeating: Your website is a reflection of your law firm and your professionalism.
You have complete control over the design. No templates, no restrictions. There is nothing preventing you from delivering a unique image with a modern aesthetic. Our websites also feature a simple to use content management system, so you have the option to update your website content whenever you want.
Read more. |
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Average Cost of Website Design For Small Law Firms?
Legal PR |
2021/07/31 04:30
|
Have you been wondering how much it will cost to design your firm’s website?
A small law firm website design from an agency can range from $5,000 to $20,000, whereas bigger and more complicated law firm websites will cost you between $20,000 to $50,000. Many times these high costs do not even mean that you will have the best website. At Law Promo, we believe higher price tag doesn’t always mean a better product.
Affordable Small Law Firm Website Design
We are able to customize a plan for those who have a budget of $3,000 to $6,000 for a small law firm website design.
Read more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court ruling gives immigrant facing deportation hope
Legal PR |
2021/06/01 21:46
|
A Guatemalan man who lived in a Massachusetts church for more than three years to avoid deportation said Tuesday he’s hopeful a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision boosts his efforts to remain in the country.
Lucio Perez’s lawyer, Glenn Formica, also said in a virtual news conference with his client that the April decision in Niz-Chavez vs. Garland also potentially affects the cases of millions more immigrants living in the country illegally.
The high court ruled in the Niz-Chavez case that federal policy has long deprived immigrants facing deportation of proper notification.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement typically issues a notice of a person’s deportation proceedings and then provides the hearing date and other key details in subsequent communications. The court ruled all relevant information should be included in a single notice.
U.S. Rep. James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat who joined Perez for the news conference, said the ruling is an opportunity to renew legislative efforts to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws.
Perez left the First Congregational Church in Amherst in March after receiving a temporary stay of his deportation. He was among more than 70 immigrants nationwide who took sanctuary in churches during former President Donald Trump’s administration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
High court sides with Google in copyright fight with Oracle
Legal PR |
2021/04/05 17:59
|
The Supreme Court sided Monday with Google in an $8 billion copyright dispute with Oracle over the internet company’s creation of the Android operating system used on most smartphones worldwide.
To create Android, which was released in 2007, Google wrote millions of lines of new computer code. But it also used 11,330 lines of code and an organization that’s part of Oracle’s Java platform.
Google had argued that what it did is long-settled, common practice in the industry, a practice that has been good for technical progress. And it said there is no copyright protection for the purely functional, noncreative computer code it used, something that couldn’t be written another way. But Austin, Texas-based Oracle said Google “committed an egregious act of plagiarism,” and it sued.
The justices ruled 6-2 for Google Inc., based in Mountain View, California. Two conservative justices dissented.
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that in reviewing a lower court’s decision, the justices assumed “for argument’s sake, that the material was copyrightable.”
“But we hold that the copying here at issue nonetheless constituted a fair use. Hence, Google’s copying did not violate the copyright law,” he wrote.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Samuel Alito that he believed “Oracle’s code at issue here is copyrightable, and Google’s use of that copyrighted code was anything but fair.”
Only eight justices heard the case because it was argued in October, after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg but before Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court.
In a statement, Google’s chief legal officer, Kent Walker, called the ruling a “victory for consumers, interoperability, and computer science.” “The decision gives legal certainty to the next generation of developers whose new products and services will benefit consumers,” Walker wrote.
Oracle’s chief legal officer, Dorian Daley, condemned the outcome. “The Google platform just got bigger and market power greater. The barriers to entry higher and the ability to compete lower. They stole Java and spent a decade litigating as only a monopolist can,” she wrote in a statement.
Microsoft, IBM and major internet and tech industry lobbying groups had weighed in on the case in favor of Google. The Motion Picture Association and the Recording Industry Association of America were among those supporting Oracle.
The case is Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc., 18-956. |
|
|
|
|
Law Firm & Attorney Directory |
Law Firm PR News provides the most current career information of legal professionals and is the top source for law firms and attorneys. |
Lawyer & Law Firm Directory |
|
|